Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:50

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Royals share new photos of Prince William with children - BBC
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Stock Market News, June 3, 2025: Nasdaq Moves Higher; OECD Cuts U.S. Growth Outlook - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Deportees are being held in a converted shipping container in Djibouti, ICE says - NPR
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What bait should you use for ocean fishing?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Archer Aviation Stock Tumbles: Here’s What This Investor Predicts Next - TipRanks
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How do I become a Buddhist, and can someone explain Buddhism to me?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.